COVID-19 Coronavirus Resources

Latest Updates

 

August 4, 2020

Council Urges Support for Employer Plans in Forthcoming Stimulus Legislation

With congressional lawmakers and the White House deep in negotiations over major pandemic relief and recovery legislation, the American Benefits Council continues to emphasize the importance of supporting employer-provided benefit plans. In an August 4 letter to Congress, the Council outlined the most urgent priorities for employer plan sponsors that the Council has been directly lobbying members of Congress and their staff for inclusion in a final version of pandemic relief legislation.

The Council’s letter summarizes an updated set of policy recommendations for supporting employer plans and employees’ health and financial security as the economy manages the pandemic. The document also highlights the legislative and regulatory accomplishments or progress since the original June 2 version of the document.

 The U.S. Senate and House of Representatives remain far apart in talks as they attempt to strike a compromise between the House-passed Health and Economic Recovery Omnibus Emergency Solutions (HEROES) Act (H.R. 6800)(see the May 13 Benefits Byte) and the Health, Economic Assistance, Liability Protection and Schools (HEALS) Act developed by Senate Republicans (see the July 29 Benefits Byte). Congressional leaders have reported some progress in negotiations, and typically when a deal on the parameters of a legislative package is ultimately struck the details come together rather quickly.  Some previous pandemic aid expired on July 29 and congressional leaders have suggested that the August recess could be delayed until an agreement is reached.

The Council’s updated policy recommendations document notes where our priorities have been included in the HEROES and HEALS acts. We will continue to advocate for these provisions until a final deal is approved. 


July 27, 2020

Senate Republicans Release Pandemic Response Bill Including Several Council Recommendations

The latest version of pandemic relief and recovery legislation was released by U.S. Senate Republicans on July 27, setting up a showdown with congressional Democrats with some of the previous relief measures set to expire on July 31. While a number of key employee benefit policy provisions were not included in the text as released,  a number of other provisions for which the Council  has been actively advocating were included,  and others  remain “in play” in negotiations.

The Health, Economic Assistance, Liability Protection and Schools (HEALS) Act is a collection of separate measures prepared by the Senate Finance Committee, the Small Business Committee and the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee and other committees. The proposal as a whole is significantly narrower than the Health and Economic Recovery Omnibus Emergency Solutions (HEROES) Act (H.R. 6800),  approved by the U.S. House of Representatives on May 15, which  includes a number of the American Benefits Council’s policy priorities. Council members can view the July 29 Benefits Byte for additional analysis.

The differences between the two measures underscore the difficulty of compromise within the next few weeks before the scheduled August recess. With negotiations now beginning in earnest, the Council is actively working to ensure that a number of important provisions for employer plan sponsors are included in the final legislative package.


July 21, 2020

PBGC Releases Guidance on Filing Deadline Extension Under CARES Act

On July 21, the Pension Benefits Guarantee Corporation (PBGC) released a new set of questions and answers to provide guidance on plan sponsor obligations and PBGC operations with regard to relief provided under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act.

The Council is concerned that PBGC’s position unnecessarily imposes a penalty on employers that take advantage of the extension provided in the CARES Act. Treasury could prevent such penalties by simply delaying the due date for the Form 5500 until early 2021, which would also delay the due date for 2020 premiums. The Council is actively advocating both with regulators and legislators that this issue be addressed.

 

PBGC also indicates in the guidance that using the CARES Act extension will not trigger a reportable event for failing to make a minimum required contribution. Guidance is also provided for companies that miss the delayed funding deadline. PBGC also confirms that the processing of distress termination applications, involuntary terminations, collection of termination liabilities and the Early Warning Program will continue during the COVID-19 crisis.

 


July 21, 2020

Council, Other Employer Groups Encourage Federal Funding, Support for COVID-19 Testing

In a July 21 letter to Congress, the American Benefits Council – along with six other organizations representing large employers and health care purchasers – called on lawmakers to include federal testing assistance in the next comprehensive bill to address the pandemic.

The Families First Coronavirus Response Act requires group health plans to cover testing for the diagnosis of COVID-19 without cost-sharing or medical management requirements, but the widespread testing also needed for public health surveillance to effectively combat the virus – especially as the case numbers rise, and to facilitate returning employees to the workplace safely – is likely to be extensive.

As the letter states, “While employers understand their key role in the national response, the sheer scale of testing (and contact tracing) required to meet the broader public health surveillance and return to work objectives nationwide means that the responsibility cannot be borne by employers alone. Indeed, the employers that will incur the greatest challenges associated with widespread testing in order to bring employees back to the workplace, are among the enterprises that have been hardest hit by the economic consequences of the pandemic.”

The Council and its fellow employer organizations are therefore calling on Congress to:

  1. Invest additional federal resources in the robust testing needed to accomplish both the public health and economic goals.
  2. Ensure that employers and taxpayers are not subject to opaque and exorbitant prices for COVID-19 tests and associated services.
  3. Ensure that testing is accurate, reliable and timely.
  4. Provide clear guidance help inform employers’ utilization of COVID-19 testing in their return to work strategies, while preserving employer flexibility in developing programs appropriate for their particular location, workforce and industry. 

As part of its Back to the Workplace series, the Council is hosting a July 23 webinar on Testing Workers for the Active Virus and Antibodies. Interested Council members can register from the Webinar Archive page.

For more information, contact Ilyse Schuman, senior vice president, health policy.


July 15, 2020

Polling Data Commissioned by Council Shows Strong Voter Support for Additional Legislation, Financial Assistance for COBRA Coverage

Lawmakers in Congress should quickly enact legislation providing financial support for COBRA health coverage, according to a nationwide poll of voters conducted on behalf of the American Benefits Council.

Millions of workers who have lost their jobs during the COVID-19 pandemic face the prospect of paying the full cost of COBRA health coverage, which, for many, will be unaffordable. The Council is urging Congress to support workers and their families by helping them afford COBRA and similar continuation coverage.

The Council engaged Public Opinion Strategies, a renowned public research firm, to conduct a national online survey of 1,000 registered voters between June 17-22 to assess their attitudes about past and future pandemic relief legislation, particularly as it relates to health care coverage. A July 13 summary memo describes the survey’s key findings.

Most importantly:

  • Voters overwhelmingly support the government acting to help those who have lost their job stay on their employer-provided plan. Nine out of every ten voters believe “the government should take action to ensure those who have lost their job maintain their employer-provided coverage.” This includes 71% of voters who believe so strongly.
  • Fully 86% of voters support federal legislation that has been already been enacted into law and 85% of voters support additional COVID-19 financial assistance legislation.
  • A large majority of voters (79%) believe additional legislation should be passed before the November election.

A recording of the Council’s June 14 webinar briefing for Capitol Hill staff is also available. 

As Council President James Klein said in a media statement, this data “makes abundantly clear that supporting employer-provided health care is the right move, right now. … Lawmakers should pass legislation that will help individuals maintain their job-based health coverage if they are laid off. We urge them to do so as soon as possible.”

The American Benefits Council, as part of its own advocacy agenda and as the leaders of the Alliance to Fight for Health Care – a diverse coalition of businesses, patient advocates, employer organizations, unions, health care companies, consumer groups and other stakeholders – is pushing for the inclusion of such a measure in the next pandemic relief/recovery bill.

For more information on health policy matters, or to provide support for this effort, contact Ilyse Schuman, senior vice president, health policy.


July 8, 2020

Surprise Billing Update: Council Pushing for Fix in Next Relief Package

With Congress negotiating the outlines of the next phase of coronavirus/COVID-19 pandemic relief/recovery legislation, the American Benefits Council is seizing the opportunity to advocate for a long-sought solution to “surprise” medical bills.

Surprise medical bills come after a patient receives services at out-of-network facilities in an emergency situation and/or uses an in-network facility but some services provided at the facility are rendered by out-of-network providers. While a number of legislative approaches have been developed to address the issue, the Council strongly supports a market-based benchmark approach based on the local median in-network rate, best embodied by the version of S. 1895 approved by the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee in July 2019.

The HEROES Act (H.R. 6800) approved by the House of Representatives on May 15 includes a provision addressing surprise billing targeted to certain patients. The legislation builds on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has released guidelines that would prevent health care providers  receiving Provider Relief Fund under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act from sending balance bills to patients who receive testing and treatment for COVID-19.

Timing on a new pandemic relief measure remains uncertain, although lawmakers may attempt to pass legislation before their recess begins in August.

The Council is urging legislators to fix surprise billing as part of any forthcoming relief measure. We have repeatedly communicated to policymakers – most recently as part of a diverse a diverse group of 49 leading employer and union organizations sending a letter to congressional leaders –  the importance of protecting all patients from surprise balance bills and hold down health care costs, especially during this public health and economic crisis.

Support from the administration and the business community will be essential to advancing surprise billing this year. For more information on health policy matters, or to provide support for this effort, contact Ilyse Schuman, senior vice president, health policy, or Katy Johnson, senior counsel, health policy.


June 24, 2020

IRS Issues Guidance for RMDs under CARES Act, SECURE Act

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued valuable guidance on June 23 addressing waivers of retirement plan required minimum distributions (RMDs). The guidance implements RMD waivers for 2020 as part of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, enacted on March 27, 2020, and covers certain similar issues under the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act, which was enacted in 2019 as part of a year-end funding measure. RMD relief is not available for distributions from defined benefit plans.

IRS Notice 2020-51, which includes a set of 12 questions and answers, addresses a broad range of topics on which the Council had sought clarification, including:

  • RMDs made in January of 2020 are permitted to be rolled over, thus filling a gap in prior guidance.
  • Relief from the 60-day period for rolling over RMDs is extended through August 31, 2020.
  • Relief is granted from the rule limiting IRA rollovers to one per year.
  • Relief from the prohibition on rolling over periodic payments made from plans.
  • Relief for non-spouse beneficiaries who received 2020 RMDs, permitting the RMDS to be rolled over.

A detailed summary, prepared by Davis and Harman LLP, is now available on the Council website.

For more information, contact Lynn Dudley, senior vice president, global retirement and compensation policy, or Jan Jacobson, senior counsel, retirement policy.


June 24, 2020

IRS Issues CARES Act Guidance on Coronavirus-related Distributions, Loans, and Limited NQDC Relief

On June 19, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released guidance (IRS Notice 2020-50) expanding the availability of coronavirus-related distributions (CRDs) and relief for loans from retirement plans under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act). As requested by the American Benefits Council in various meetings and correspondence with executive branch officials (see the Council’s March 26April 20, and May 21 letters), the new guidance expands the pool of “qualified individuals” allowed to withdraw CRDs without penalty and provides guidance on a number of important issues for employers.

View the highlights in our June 24 Benefits Byte. A detailed summary of IRS Notice 2020-50, prepared by Davis & Harman LLP, is available for members on the Council website.


June 23, 2020

Tri-Agencies Release Guidance Regarding COVID-19 Testing and Other COVID-19 Health Care Issues

On June 23, the U.S. departments of Labor, Treasury and Health and Human Services (the “tri-agencies”) issued Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Part 43, addressing the group health plan requirements included in the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) and the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), as well as other health coverage issues related to COVID-19. A detailed summary of the guidance is available on the Council website.

Read more in our June 24 Benefits Byte.


June 17, 2020

Council Urges Continued Support for Telehealth in HELP Committee Hearing Statement

In conjunction with a June 17 U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee hearing, Telehealth: Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic, the Council sent a written statement urging lawmakers to provide additional support for telehealth following recent pandemic relief action to expand access.

The Council strongly supports greater access to telehealth services, especially in the context of the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, as telehealth provides necessary medical care in a manner designed to support the practice of social distancing, thereby helping prevent the further spread of illness. “Increasing employers’ ability to offer telehealth to employees” was included as one of the Council’s pandemic-related policy recommendations.

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act (H.R. 748) included a provision allowing HSA-eligible HDHPs to cover telehealth services without cost-sharing. However, some employers also wish to provide telehealth services to employees who are not benefits eligible or who opted out of the employer’s group health plan. A number of employers have done so on a limited basis consistent with current “excepted benefit” regulations. However, others wish to provide more comprehensive telehealth coverage to these employees. Nevertheless, such robust standalone telehealth programs covering non-benefits eligible individuals could run afoul of the ACA market reforms.

The Council’s written statement underscores these employer concerns and urges policymakers to make permanent the CARES Act provision and provide additional flexibility for employers that wish to provide telehealth services – at least for the current plan year and any plan year that begins before the end of the COVID-19 related public health emergency.

The statement also recommends immediate action to remove state barriers to telehealth care (such as requiring that patients have a pre-existing relationship with the provider) and allow licensed providers to provide services to patients in other states via telehealth.

The Council also cautions Congress against imposing any mandates relating to telehealth that would impede employers’ flexibility to innovate and pursue value-based care. The Council supports the Healthcare at Home Act (H.R. 6644), which would require group health plans and health insurance issuers to provide coverage for services furnished via telehealth, if such services would be covered if furnished in-person during the COVID-19 emergency, and requiring plans and issuers to pay the same amount for those services.

HELP Committee Chairman Lamar Alexander (R-TN) opened the hearing by explaining that “one purpose of this hearing is to find out which of these temporary changes in federal policy should be maintained, modified or reversed, and also to find out if there are additional federal policies that would help patients and health care providers take advantage of delivering medical services using telehealth.”

The committee heard from a panel of medical professionals who described how telehealth services have grown over the course of the pandemic, why continued expansion will be important (especially for rural and low-income patients) and what public policies would be most beneficial moving forward. Questions for the witnesses addressed a variety of topics including access to behavioral health services, the role of government vs. the private sector, the potential risks of pulling back from telehealth, compliance with HIPAA privacy requirements and how insurer coverage of telehealth services will affect premiums.

One recurring theme of the hearing was the matter of telehealth reimbursement rates. Asked by Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC) whether private insurance or government regulation is the bigger hurdle to expanded telehealth adoption, Dr. Joseph C. Kvedar, president of the American Telemedicine Association and professor at Harvard Medical School, recommended that Medicare and Medicare keep telehealth reimbursement rates equal to those for in-office visits even after the pandemic is over. Dr. Andrea D. Willis, senior vice president and chief medical officer at Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee, said that reimbursement rates will depend, to some extent, on what kind of cost efficiencies develop as telehealth expands.

The Council’s statement explains that “such ‘parity’ requirements fail to acknowledge the broad spectrum of services encompassed by the term “telehealth” – from virtual visits with a patient’s existing provider to telemedicine services by unknown providers. Furthermore, payment parity requirements ignore the value equation in using telehealth to drive higher-quality, lower-cost care.”

For more information on health policy matters, contact Ilyse Schuman, senior vice president, health policy, or Katy Johnson, senior counsel, health policy.


June 9, 2020

Council Hosts Webcast on Global Retirement Plan Responses to the Pandemic

The American Benefits Council recently hosted a webcast featuring a panel of speakers from around the world to discuss global retirement plan responses to the coronavirus/COVID-19 pandemic. A panel of speakers -- speaking from the United Kingdom, Ireland, Germany, the Middle East and Asia -- compared the approaches of various countries and regions to issues such as funding relief, wage subsidies, employee access to pension funds and electronic communications.

A recording of the event is available on the Council's Webinar Archive.


    June 9, 2020

    Retirement ‘Secure Choice’ Retirement Plan Chart Updated

    The American Benefits Council continues to pay close attention to efforts at the state level to expand retirement coverage in ways that would burden existing employer-sponsored plans or impose alternative rules on retirement plans. Two charts now featured on the Council’s Center on State Initiatives website have recently been updated with new information and updates related to the coronavirus/COVID-19 pandemic. The Council’s state plan comparison chart, prepared by Davis & Harman LLP,  is now available and featured on the Council’s Center on State Initiatives website

    Read about recent state plan updates in our June 9 Benefits Byte.


    June 4, 2020

    IRS Temporarily Allows Spousal Consent without Physical Presence

    On June 3, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued Notice 2020-42, providing temporary relief from the requirement that spousal consents of certain plan participant elections must be witnessed in the “physical presence” of a notary or plan representative. The relief applies to spousal consents of participant elections from January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020.

    Current law requires spousal consent for certain retirement plan participants (predominantly pension plan participants) to receive benefits in the form of a lump sum distribution. Treasury requires that spousal consent be witnessed in the “physical presence” of a plan representative or notary, but such practices may be inconsistent with ongoing social distancing recommendations during the coronavirus/COVID-19 pandemic.

    In frequent communications with the executive branch, including letters to Congress and to the U.S. Treasury Department and IRS, the American Benefits Council has urged immediate measures to allow remote notarization consistent with social distancing measures. The Council has also advocated for enactment of the Electronic (SECURE) Notarization Act (S. 3533/H.R. 6364), which would permit the use of electronic spousal consent with strict protections to ensure that the consent is valid.

    Read more about the regulation requirements in our June 4 Benefits Byte.


    June 3, 2020

    American Benefits Council unveils policy recommendations 

    Strengthening employee benefit plans an essential response to the COVID-19 pandemic

    WASHINGTON, DC –  “The COVID-19 pandemic has created both a health and an economic crisis.  Employer-sponsored benefit plans are an essential part of the nation’s response to provide health and financial security for workers and families,” American Benefits Council President James A. Klein said today. 

    “As lawmakers consider additional action to ease some of the burdens imposed by the pandemic, we urge them to focus on how to do the most good most quickly,” Klein said. “That means strengthening employer-provided health and retirement benefits. The American Benefits Council has developed a blueprint for doing just that.”

    “The Council is proud of the role it has played in the legislative and regulatory responses we’ve seen thus far, and we commend policymakers from both parties for their quick action.  But more must be done,” said Klein. The Council has shared with Congress and the executive branch a set of recommendations for supporting displaced workers and others affected by the “pandemic economy.” Taken together, these proposals constitute a comprehensive plan to help employers harness the strength of employee benefit plans. “We will continue working with Congress and the Administration to help as many people as quickly as possible,” Klein concluded. 

    For more information, or to arrange an interview with the Council’s health or retirement policy teams, contact Jason Hammersla, Council vice president, communications, at jhammersla@abcstaff.org or by phone at (202) 422-4652 (cell).

    View or download the PDF version


    May 15, 2020

    Benefits Briefing Webinar: COVID-19 Deadline Extensions and Other Regulatory Updates

    The American Benefits Council held a Benefits Briefing webinar on May 15 to discuss recent regulatory guidance that extended a number of deadlines for benefit plan administrators and plan participants in light of the ongoing pandemic emergency. This guidance is relevant to both health and retirement plans. Speakers discussed recent regulatory guidance concerning coronavirus-related retirement plan distributions and loans under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act.

    Jan Jacobson, senior counsel, retirement policy, and Katy Johnson, senior counsel, health policy, moderated the webinar, which featured the following guest speakers:

    The panelists discussed the following recently issued guidance (see the May 1May 4 and May 7 Benefits Bytes for more details):

    A recording of this webinar is available on the Council's Webinar Archive.


    May 13, 2020

    House Democrats Release New Coronavirus Relief Bill Including Full COBRA Coverage Subsidy, Retirement Plan Relief

    As we first reported in the May 12 Benefits Byte, Democratic lawmakers in the U.S. House of Representatives released the Health and Economic Recovery Omnibus Emergency Solutions (HEROES) Act (H.R. 6800), the starting point for the next phase of coronavirus relief legislation, along with a section-by-section summary of the bill.

    Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has announced her intention to vote on the measure on May 15. Since H.R. 6800 was developed without the input of the White House or congressional Republicans, an extended period of negotiation and significant changes by the Senate are likely before the next package can be enacted.

    The lengthy, $3 trillion measure includes a number of the American Benefits Council’s health and retirement policy priorities as well as provisions that would be problematic for employers.

    See our brief summary of the bill’s key provisions in our May 13 Benefits Byte.


    May 12, 2020

    Treasury and IRS Issue Guidance Allowing Additional Flexibility for Cafeteria Plans, Health FSAs and Dependent Care FSAs

    On May 12, 2020, the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued two notices which provide additional flexibility for employers with respect to cafeteria plans, health flexible spending arrangements (health FSAs) and dependent care flexible spending arrangements (dependent care FSAs):

    • Notice 2020-29 provides increased flexibility for cafeteria plans (and relatedly, health plans, health FSAs and dependent care FSAs) and also clarifies some COVID-19 related provisions related to health savings account (HSA)- eligible high deductible health plans (HDHPs). The guidance in this notice is specific to the COVID-19 crisis and is provided “to assist with the nation’s response to” COVID-19.
    • Notice 2020-33, released simultaneously, modifies the permissive carryover rule for health FSAs and includes a clarification regarding reimbursements of premiums by individual coverage health reimbursement arrangements (individual coverage HRAs). The guidance in this notice is not specific to the COVID-19 crisis.

    Read our May 12 Benefits Byte for more. A detailed summary of both notices is also available on the Council website. 


    May 11, 2020

    Council Urges Congress to Include Pension Funding & Stabilization Reform in COVID-19 Relief

    In a May 8 letter to Congress, the American Benefits Council urged U.S. Senate and House leadership to include pension funding and stabilization reform in upcoming Coronavirus (COVID-19) relief. The Council’s letter follows up on an April 7 letter providing specific policy proposals to address prevalent plan sponsor concerns that have been exacerbated by the economic impact of the Coronavirus pandemic (see the April 9 Benefits Byte).

    The May 8 letter emphasizes the importance of two specific Council proposals that were originally incorporated into the House version of the bill that was part of the process that led to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act but not included in the final package. These proposals would (1) extend and enhance “interest rate stabilization,” which adjusts current interest rates to be closer to historical norms, and (2) allow employers to pay for pension liabilities, including those attributable to the crisis, over 15 years, instead of seven years.

    Read more about the Council's proposals in our May 11 Benefits Byte.


    May 11, 2020

    HHS Finalizes Rules Addressing Drug Manufacturers’ Coupons and Other Issues

    As part of regulations issued annually to implement selected aspects of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released the final Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2021 (the final 2021 NBPP) on May 7. These final rules address a number of issues relevant to plan sponsors, along with a number of issues outside that purview.

    Read more about these issues in our May 11 Benefits ByteA detailed summary of these issues is also available on the Council website.


    May 7, 2020

    Upon Further Review: Additional Clarifications of IRS CARES Act Guidance on Retirement Plans

    As we reported in the May 4 Benefits Byte, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has issued preliminary guidance addressing Section 2202 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), which provides for special coronavirus-related distribution (CRD) options and rollover rules for retirement plans and IRAs and expands permissible loans from certain retirement plans.

    Read our May 7 Benefits Byte for additional clarifications and thoughts based on further review of the FAQs.


    May 4, 2020

    Council, Peer Organizations Call for Swift Publication of Final Electronic Disclosure Rules

    In a May 1 letter to the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB), the Council and 14 other business and trade associations called on the Administration to “expeditiously finalize” regulations expanding electronic disclosure for retirement plans.

    As we reported in the April 21 Benefits Byte, the final rules have reportedly been sent to OMB as the final step before formal publication in the Federal Register.

    The Council previously provided written comments to the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) and the Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA), offering support for the proposed version of the regulations, and remains hopeful that the measure will be reviewed and published quickly. 

    Read more about the Council's comments to OMB in our May 4 Benefits Byte.


    May 4, 2020
    IRS Issues Q&A Guidance on CARES Act Retirement Provisions

    The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued preliminary guidance on May 4 addressing Section 2202 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), which provides for special coronavirus-related distribution (CRD) options and rollover rules for retirement plans and IRAs and expands permissible loans from certain retirement plans.

    The CARES Act was signed into law on March 27 as the third major piece of legislation designed to mitigate the severe health and economic impact of the Coronavirus/COVID-19 pandemic. The Council summarized its health and retirement benefits provisions in the March 26 Benefits Byte and discussed the provisions in detail in an April 10 Benefits Briefing webinar.

    The new guidance, presented as a series of questions and answers, addresses a number of questions raised by Council members. Learn more in our May 4 Benefits Byte.


    May 5, 2020

    Council Joined by Former Senate Leader Bill Frist, Wellview Health Co-Founder Cole Barfield in Webinar on COVID-19 Medical and Public Policy Considerations

    On May 5, the American Benefits Council hosted a one-hour Benefits Briefing webinar in which medical professionals will share their insights on the battle against COVID-19, including considerations for employers in developing return-to-work policies.

    Joining us for this webinar were special guests Dr. Bill Frist, former majority leader of the U.S. Senate, and Dr. Cole Barfield, chief medical officer and co-founder of Wellview Health. The doctors shared their insights on the battle against COVID-19, including:

    • The latest data on COVID-19, infection rates, symptoms, hospitalization and outcomes
    • The outlook for treatment and vaccines
    • The importance of testing – where we are and where we need to be – and the role of antibody testing and what it means
    • The role and responsibilities of federal, state and local governments
    • Preparedness of the government and health care system for what comes next

    A recording of this webinar is now available for anyone who missed this thoughtful and informative session. 


    May 1, 2020

    Labor, Treasury Issue Guidance Delaying Certain Participant, Plan Deadlines in Response to COVID-19

    As reported in the April 29 Benefits Byte, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) has announced timing extensions to a host of deadlines for plans and participants that apply during the coronavirus/COVID-19 outbreak period. A detailed summary of this guidance is now available on the Council website.

    The documents posted were:

    • A notification of relief (previously labeled as “final regulations,” jointly issued with the U.S. Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service)

    Many of the forms of relief provided in Notice 2020-01 had been requested by the Council in conversations with agency personnel, as memorialized in a March 26 letter to Treasury/IRS/DOL/PBGC requesting retirement-related emergency relief.

    However, the notification of relief provides extensions that the Council had not requested and which raise a number of administrative and other issues for plan sponsors that are described more fully in the Council’s summary. Although the regulations provide extensions for participants regarding, among other things, election of and payment for COBRA, the guidance does not help make COBRA more affordable for participants. 


    April 23, 2020

    Funding rules could result in $24 billion diverted from economic recovery, almost 500K lost jobs

    The American Benefits Council has completed the first study of the effects of the current health and economic crises on the defined benefit plan system, with sobering results.

    “Among the many devastating effects of the ongoing pandemic is the profound harm inflicted on employee pensions,” said Lynn Dudley, senior vice president, global retirement and compensation policy. “Without swift intervention by Congress, this damage could pose a serious impediment to our economic recovery.”

    The key findings of the study were:

    • 703 companies participated in this study. The companies were primarily larger, but over 70 smaller companies were included.
    • On average, funding obligations are projected to increase over 98% from 2020 to 2021. At a time when companies are struggling to stay afloat, this is a shocking and unnecessary increase. There is no need for such a debilitating increase since today’s abnormal conditions bear no relationship to the companies’ ability to pay for pension obligations that may be as many as 50 years away.
    • Just among these 703 companies, this increase results in them owing over $9 billion more for 2021 than for 2020.
    • Why is this increase in funding obligations occurring? This is a direct result of (1) the economic crisis and (2) the structure of the funding rules. In an economic downturn, the funding rules require plan asset losses to be made up very quickly, and these losses can be billions of dollars.
    • If the original U.S. House of Representatives version of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act were enacted, it would save these 703 companies over $12 billion for 2021. What the House provision would do in the aggregate is undo the severely adverse effects of the current crisis by returning funding levels just slightly below 2020 levels. This is not relief, it is stabilization: preventing the crisis from unnecessarily costing jobs and jeopardizing businesses based solely on the volatile quirks of the funding rules.
    • This study covers only 3% of all PBGC insured plans. Total savings from the House provision would likely be well over $24 billion in one year. Based on the most recent PBGC data, there are over 23,000 PBGC-insured plans. Even if we exclude plans with under 1,000 participants, there are over 2,500 such plans, almost four times the size of our study. If the House funding provisions are enacted, at a minimum, is hard to imagine that the national savings for all plans in the country are not at least double the savings for our 703, bringing the total savings to over $24 billion in one year. If we use$50,000 as a proxy for an annual salary, this would translate into 480,000 jobs.

    For more information, or to arrange an interview with the Council’s retirement policy team, contact Jason Hammersla, Council vice president, communications, at jhammersla@abcstaff.org or by phone at (202) 422-4652 (cell).

    View the PDF version of this news release.


    April 21, 2020

    Final Electronic Disclosure Rules Sent to OMB, Publication Appears Imminent

    Final regulations expanding electronic disclosure for retirement plans have been sent to the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB), typically the final step before rules are formally published in the Federal Register. The Council previously provided written comments to the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) and the Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA), offering strong support for the proposed version of the regulations, and remains hopeful that the measure will be reviewed and published quickly. 

    Although we do not know what, if any, changes have been made since the proposed rule, it is even more important than ever to have workable electronic disclosure rules due to the massive company shutdowns and social distancing required for COVID-19. Not only is it not possible right now for most companies to post notices in the workplace that will be seen by all employees, the service providers that companies hire to print and mail paper copies of notices are generally shut down as well.

    Read more in our April 21 Benefits Byte.


     

    April 21, 2020

    Council Recommends Urgent Changes to Notarization Rules for Retirement Plan Beneficiaries

    To help retirement plan participants facing economic hardships, the American Benefits Council is urging changes to qualified retirement plan spousal consent notarization rules, thereby allowing plan sponsors to make lump-sum distributions to participants in a manner consistent with public health and social distancing conventions.

    In April 20 letters to Congress and to the U.S. Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service, the Council urged immediate measures to address this situation, including enactment of the Electronic (SECURE) Notarization Act (S. 3533/H.R. 6364), perhaps as part of the next phase of coronavirus economic stimulus legislation.

    Read more in our April 21 Benefits Byte.

    April 13, 2020

    Council Urges Treasury and IRS to Provide Additional Health Care Flexibility

    The Council submitted a letter to the Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on April 13, requesting guidance on a number of key health care issues on which guidance is needed to provide employers additional flexibility in their efforts to assist employees in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and related economic crisis.

    The requests stem from the dramatic and unforeseen changes in circumstances related to the pandemic for employers and employees, including the inability of employees and their families to undergo elective medical procedures, school closures and other child care provider changes, increased health care expenses and concerns for employees and their families and financial hardships. We also request clarification on a number of previous guidance and relief.


    April 13, 2020

    Council Letter to DOL, WHD Requests Guidance on Outstanding FFCRA Paid Leave Issues

    In an April 13 letter to the WHD, the Council detailed additional issues requiring further clarification and guidance from the agency regarding the two new paid leave programs established by the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA)

    While these programs are specifically intended for employers with fewer than 500 employees, the Council’s recent Benefits Blueprint summary focused on helping large private employers determine whether they may be subject to each of these new leave requirements and how the 500-employee threshold applies to companies that may be part of larger control groups or otherwise have related companies. In the Council’s April 13 letter, we follow up on a number of unresolved paid leave issues.


    April 11, 2020

    Tri-Agencies Release Guidance Regarding COVID-19 Legislation, Other Health Coverage Issues

    On April 11, the U.S. departments of Labor, Treasury and Health and Human Services (collectively, the “tri-agencies”) issued important guidance in the form of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the group health plan requirements included in the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA), and the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), as well as other health coverage issues related to COVID-19. This is the first tri-agency guidance on these provisions and, as stated in the FAQs, the tri-agencies anticipate issuing additional guidance on these topics as well. 

    The tri-agencies begin the FAQs by setting out their approach to FFCRA and CARES Act implementation “which is and will continue to be marked by an emphasis on assisting (rather than imposing penalties on) group health plans, health insurance issuers and others that are working diligently and in good faith to understand and come into compliance with the new law.”  

    The FAQs address many of the items on which the Council previously sought clarification and relief


    April 10, 2020

    IRS Extends Numerous Deadlines as Part of Coronavirus Relief

    On April 9, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued Notice 2020-23, extending or postponing a number of tax filing and payment deadlines in compliance with the president’s emergency declaration under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act – the federal law designed to bring an orderly and systematic means of federal natural disaster assistance for state and local governments.

    The Council requested many of these extensions in communications with regulatory officials, including in a letter dated March 26. For a full account of the extensions for health and retirement benefit plans,  Council members can refer to the April 10 Benefits Byte.


    April 9, 2020

    Council, Allies Reiterate Support for Telehealth Expansion, Offer Recommendations

    In an April 9 letter, cosigned by America’s Health Insurance Plans and America’s Physician Groups, the American Benefits Council urged policymakers at key regulatory agencies to provide guidance that would most effectively expand access to telehealth services. The Council strongly supports greater access to telehealth services, especially in the context of the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, as telehealth provides necessary medical care in a manner designed to support the practice of social distancing, thereby helping prevent the further spread of illness.

    The April 9 joint letter focuses on two priority requests for additional guidance:

    • Summary of Benefits and Coverage (SBC): the tri-agencies should adopt a non-enforcement safe harbor from the current law requirement that plans provide 60-day advance notice of modifications to the SBC, so plans can immediately enhance telehealth coverage. The relief would apply if the changes at issue are benefit enhancements related to COVID-19 and the plan provides notice to participants of the changes as soon as practical. 
    • Telehealth Services for Employees Who Are Not Benefits-Eligible: the tri-agencies should take action allowing employers to offer more substantial telehealth coverage than is currently permitted to employees who are not benefits eligible or who have opted out of the employer’s traditional group health plan. 

     


    April 7, 2020

    Council Continues to Push Congress on Pension Funding Stabilization

    The American Benefits Council has been in constant contact with congressional and committee leadership to emphasize the importance of pension funding and premium stabilization for staving off bankruptcy and preserving jobs in light of the economic crises caused by the coronavirus pandemic. In an April 7 letter including specific legislative proposals, the Council summarized these plan sponsor concerns.

    “The pandemic and resulting impact on business operations and the market as a whole have devastated company revenues. In addition, pension asset values have been very severely affected in many instances. … Lack of stabilization could mean that companies will face (1) more layoffs than they might otherwise, (2) limited ability to get their business on track and (3) in some cases even more serious challenges staying in business.”

    The Council is therefore proposing a set of measures that will help pension plan sponsors manage the pandemic and beyond. Our core proposals include permanent “smoothing” of interest rates used to make funding calculations and 15-year amortization of funding shortfalls. Additional temporary proposals include asset smoothing and relief from benefit restrictions and current PBGC premium levels.

    The Council is following up on this correspondence with additional communications and virtual meetings with Capitol Hill staff. If you are interested in participating in these meetings or if you are reaching out to your own elected representatives, you may wish to avail yourself of the Council’s updated talking points on pension funding stabilization.


    April 2, 2020

    Progress Report: Council Achievements in the CARES Act

    The Council has prepared a “progress report” on the many specific policy recommendations we provided in the lead-up to the development of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act in our discussions with Capitol Hill staff and in numerous written communications to Congress.

    While many of our recommendations were at least partially incorporated in the CARES Act, some priorities remain outstanding. For the purposes of future legislation, the Council continues to emphasize the importance of protecting and strengthening employer-provided benefits as an economic safety net for millions of workers and their families.


    April 1, 2020

    Now Available: Updated Summary of Health, Paid Leave Provisions in Coronavirus Response Legislation

    Now that the federal government has enacted both the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) and the “economic stimulus” Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, many employers may have questions about their obligations under these new laws.

    We had previously provided a Benefits Blueprint summary of the health and paid leave provisions in the FFCRA. A newly updated Benefits Blueprint summary, prepared by Groom Law Group, Chartered, is now available that details the group health plan requirements and paid leave provisions enacted through the FFCRA as well as the CARES Act, along with recent guidance including a temporary rule implementing the paid leave requirementsreleased by the U.S. Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division on April 1.


    March 31, 2020

    Detailed Summary Now Available for FMLA, Paid Sick Leave Requirements under Coronavirus Legislation

    American Benefits Council members now have access to a summary of two significant paid leave provisions included in the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA), as signed into law on March 18:

    • The “Expanded FMLA Leave Requirement” requires employers with fewer than 500 employees to provide up to 12 weeks of job-protected leave related to care for a child via an expansion of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), with the first 10 days unpaid).
    • The “Emergency Paid Sick Leave Requirement” requires employers with fewer than 500 employees to provide up to 80 hours (generally two weeks) of emergency paid “sick” leave to full-time employees, with special rules for part-time employees.

    The new leave requirements are effective on April 1, 2020, and extend through December 31, 2020. The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) subsequently issued a Field Assistance Bulletin indicating non-enforcement period regarding the new leave requirements through April 17, 2020.

    Now available for American Benefits Council members is a detailed Benefits Blueprint summary focused on helping private employers determine whether they may be subject to each of these new leave requirements. Specifically, it addresses how the 500-employee threshold applies to companies that may be part of larger controlled groups or otherwise have related companies. 


    March 28, 2020

    Council Focuses on Regulatory Activity as Coronavirus Response Pauses in Congress

    With Congress on recess for at least the next few weeks, federal regulators are now tasked with implementing the many provisions recently enacted by Congress, as well as relief that can be provided in the absence of legislation. Throughout this crisis, the American Benefits Council has been in frequent communication with regulatory officials to recommend additional steps the agencies can take to ease plan administration for employer plan sponsors and facilitate assistance for affected individuals and families.

    On March 26, the Council’s retirement policy team sent a letter to the U.S. Department of Treasury, the Internal Revenue Service, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation describing specific challenges employer-sponsored retirement plans are encountering as a result of the coronavirus/COVID-19 health emergency and requesting targeted relief. The IRS has since responded with informal guidance that deadlines have been extended for 403(b) plans and pre-approved defined benefit plans.

    On March 27, the Council’s health policy team followed up with a similar effort to Treasury, the DOL and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services addressing critical health policy regulatory issues.

    As regulatory agencies issue guidance, we will be list that guidance on this page in the column on the right side. Stay tuned for additional releases.


    March 27, 2020

    Coronavirus Economic Stimulus Package Signed into Law; Council Acknowledges Capitol Hill Staff, Federal Officials

    The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law by the president on March 27, after the U.S. House of Representatives followed the Senate by approving the bill in a hurried legislative session. The $2.2 trillion measure is intended to provide economic relief for individuals and businesses hit hardest by the coronavirus pandemic, with a number of provisions targeting employee benefit programs.

    In a news release following enactment, American Benefits Council President James Klein called the CARES Act an important step in the long fight to protect public health and restore confidence in the economy. He also used the occasion to recognize the hard work of numerous congressional staff members and regulatory officials with whom Council staff has been working.

    “So-called ‘Washington bureaucrats’ are often the target of unfounded criticism. All Americans should be very proud of these public servants for their selfless, tireless dedication over long days and nights this past two weeks. The Council has worked closely with congressional staff from both sides of the aisle and political and career officials at the departments of Labor, Treasury and Health and Human Services, the Internal Revenue Service and others. They deserve our thanks and praise,” Klein said.

    While Congress has recessed until April 20, lawmakers and their staffs will contemplate additional coronavirus response legislation. The Council is already engaged in communications with these officials to urge additional action on outstanding benefits policy priorities such as support for employer-provided health care and retirement plans relating to COBRA, surprise billing, 401(k) plan operations and pension funding reform, paid leave and other matters.


    March 26, 2020

    Recording Now Available for Coronavirus/COVID-19 Global Update Webcast

    On March 26, the American Benefits Council hosted a webcast to discuss the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on global human resources and benefits operations. The webcast was provided under the auspices of the Council's Benefits Passport series, which focuses on global issues for multinational companies.

    Richard Polak, senior global advisor, moderated a discussion with a team of specialists from China, Singapore, France, the United Kingdom, Brazil and Canada, representing consulting and law practices including Aon, Gallagher, Mercer, Paul Hastings and others.

    A recording of this session is available for Council members here.


    March 25, 2020

    Lawmakers Reach Agreement on Economic Stimulus Package

    Republicans and Democrats in both houses of Congress have reached agreement on a legislative package to prop up the economy amid the ongoing coronavirus pandemic.

    The nearly $2 trillion Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act [Division A | Division B] is expected to go before the U.S. Senate for a procedural vote as early as March 25, with a vote on the bill itself shortly thereafter. The measure will then be sent to the U.S. House of Representatives. If the House approves the bill as-is, it would then proceed to the White House, where the president is expected to sign it into law.

    Now available are:

    The Council will follow up soon with additional analysis of the health policy, retirement plan and paid leave provisions of the bill.


    March 23, 2020

    Council Urging Action on Telehealth, COBRA Subsidies, Pension Relief as Congress Negotiates Stimulus Package

    Lawmakers in the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives continue to try and reach compromise on far-reaching legislation designed to stimulate the economy in light of the recent severe shocks to U.S. financial and labor markets, precipitated by the coronavirus/COVID-19 pandemic.The following specific areas continue to be a significant focus for the Council:

    Telehealth

    The Council supports greater access to telehealth services, which provide necessary medical care in a manner designed to support the practice of social distancing, thereby helping prevent the further spread of the coronavirus. We have expressed support for legislation (S. 3539) introduced by Senator Steve Daines (R-MT), that would specifically exempt telehealth services from certain HDHP rules and on March 20 submitted a letter to the U.S. Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service strongly recommending guidance permitting HDHPs to cover telehealth visits pre-deductible (or at a lower deductible), without regard to whether the visit directly relates to COVID-19.

    In addition to the Council’s own letters, we also signed on to letters authored by the Smarter Health Care Coalition and by an informal coalition of employer and insurer stakeholders.

    COBRA Subsidies

    The Council is urging Congress to include provisions in stimulus legislation to support continued employer-provided health coverage. Specifically, we recommend the provision of government-provided COBRA subsidies to help furloughed or terminated employees obtain continued access to health coverage – as was done in the 2008-2009 recession. The Council was one of two dozen employers, trade associations and organized labor groups to sign on to a letter urging lawmakers to establish a federal program to subsidize COBRA continuation of coverage for workers who lose health care coverage due to loss of a job or a reduction in hours.

    Pension Funding

    As we have previously reported, several months ago the Council established the Coalition for Stable Pension Funding and is working to obtain defined benefit pension plan relief in the final economic stimulus package. On March 23, actuaries from five of the nation’s largest employee benefit consulting firms sent a letter to Congress urging pension funding stabilization and a delay in funding obligations. 


    March 22, 2020

    Coronavirus Webinar Recordings Now Available for Council Members Only

    The American Benefits Council recently hosted two webinars in which we discussed policy and operational issues employers are facing as they manage the COVID-19 crisis. A March 19 webinar focused on health insurance coverage and paid leave while the March 20 webinar focused on retirement plan issues. Recordings for these sessions are available to Council members through the preceding links.


    March 22, 2020

    Companies Urged to Contact Congress as Stimulus Negotiations Continue

    The American Benefits Council has issued an Action Alert strongly recommending employers contact their elected representatives to urge support for the inclusion of important employee benefit provisions in coronavirus/COVID-19 economic stimulus legislation:

    ACTION ALERT: Lawmakers Finalizing Economic Stimulus Package with Several Employee Benefit Provisions Hanging in Balance

    A version of Senate Republicans' Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act failed to advance in a procedural vote on March 22, but negotiations continue in the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives.

    The Council's Action Alert outlines a number of important provisions that remain "in play" as lawmakers continue to negotiate a final legislative package.


    March 21, 2020

    Broad Coalition Relaunches to Stabilize Employer-Provided Health Care Coverage

    Today, the Alliance to Fight the 40|Don’t Tax My Health Care, a broad-based coalition that successfully led the advocacy effort to repeal the 40% tax on employer-provided health benefits known as the “Cadillac Tax,” announced a new effort with the goal of preserving health coverage for working Americans and their families in the wake of the global COVID-19 pandemic.

    The group has rebranded as the Alliance to Fight for Health Care and will work to make sure families can maintain their job-based health care coverage throughout this global health and economic crisis. The coalition’s proposals focus on:

    • Continuing health care coverage after job loss
    • Supporting employers offering health care
    • Stability for health care funds providing coverage for millions of workers
    • Supporting continuity of health coverage and our nation’s health care infrastructure

    On March 22, the AFHC sent a letter to Congress and a letter to the White House reiterating many of the American Benefits Council’s priorities.


    March 20, 2020

    Council Letter to Congress Outlines Range of Employee Benefit Issues Requiring Attention

    The American Benefits Council remains actively engaged with Congress and executive branch agencies as the federal government continues to respond to the coronavirus/COVID-19 pandemic.

    On March 20 we sent all members of Congress a letter addressing, in one document, most of the COVID-19 related issues we have been advocating with the legislative branch. 

    Among the several issues referenced in our letter concerning health benefits, we have also communicated again with the Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) concerning telehealth. A March 20 letter addresses that issue as well since we are advocating at both the legislative and regulatory level on this and a number of other matters.


    March 20, 2020

    Results of Comprehensive Coronavirus/COVID-19 Survey Now Available to Members

    From March 11-16, the American Benefits Council conducted a comprehensive and detailed survey of American companies on their coronavirus and COVID-19 policies and practices with respect to paid leave, health insurance coverage and retirement plans. 

    The full survey summary and report is available to Council members.

    It is important to note that even over the relatively short time period during which this survey was in the field, organizational policies with respect to the COVID-19 crisis may have changed significantly. Additionally, a number of questions have been superseded by federal action. This may not, therefore, be an accurate picture of where the same response pool is today.

    Some of the most noteworthy results include:

    • Forty-six percent expressed “extreme concern” on behalf of their company with regard to the COVID-19 crisis, while just over half (52%) expressed “moderate concern”. Only 2% expressed “minimal concern.”
    • More than two-thirds (68%) said their organization would support “a federal requirement that employers provide up to 7 days of accrued PTO/paid sick leave per year and up to an additional 14 days of emergency PTO/paid sick leave for public health emergencies (including COVID-19) if state and local paid sick leave laws were preempted.” [emphasis added here]
    • More than three-quarters (79%) of responding organizations indicated that they are increasing or encouraging the use of telehealth in their health plan in light of the COVID-19 epidemic.
    • Nearly two-thirds (64%) are concerned about increased pension plan liabilities resulting from the economic impact of COVID-19. (For this and the following questions, it should be noted that most answers were provided prior to the rapid decline in the stock market the past few days and also the Federal Reserve Bank’s most recent decision to reduce interest rates.)
    • The same percentage (64%) expressed either “significant interest” or “very significant interest” in legislation that would stabilize pension funding requirements. An additional 24% expressed “moderate interest.”
    • Of those responding organizations that maintain a defined contribution plan, close to two-thirds (62%) indicate they are responding to questions from participants and beneficiaries on an individual basis, while nearly 57% incorporate educational information about significant market drops and economic downturns in resources available to plan participants and beneficiaries. 17 percent are proactively communicating broadly with all plan participants and beneficiaries on the financial impact of COVID-19.

    March 19, 2020

    President Signs COVID-19 Response Legislation Into Law; Congress Turning to Economic Stimulus Package

    On March 18, the president signed into law the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (H.R. 6201) following a 90-8 vote to approve the measure in the U.S. Senate. 

    An updated Benefits Blueprint summary of the legislation as enacted, prepared by Groom Law Group, Chartered, is now available. [Blueprints are normally accessible exclusively by Council members, but we are making this edition free to all.] Given that the Senate passed H.R. 6201 without amendment, the content in the updated Blueprint is essentially the same as the previous iteration.

    Congress now turns its attention to a separate legislative measure designed to stimulate the economy in light of the substantial financial hardships and volatility created by the coronavirus pandemic.

    The Council is urging lawmakers to address a number of outstanding issues in the next legislative package, including measure that would provide relief to retirement plan participants, IRA owners, retirement plans and retirement plan sponsors. In recent letters to the House and Senate, the Council outlined specific recommendations addressing:

    • Retirement plan distributions and loans (based on disaster relief in 2019 spending legislation)
    • Required minimum distribution relief for 2020
    • Student loan repayment programs 
    • Defined benefit pension plan relief
    • Notice, application and reporting deadlines

    March 18, 2020

    Senate to Vote on House-Passed Coronavirus Response Legislation Today; Benefits Blueprint Summary Available

    Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has confirmed that the Senate will vote today on the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (H.R. 6201), which passed the U.S. House of Representatives by a vote of 363-40 on March 14 and was then modified on March 16. The White House has given its blessing to the measure.

    A Benefits Blueprint summary of the House-passed bill, prepared by Groom Law Group, Chartered, is now available. [Blueprints are normally accessible exclusively by Council members, but we are making this edition free to all.]

    Congress and the Administration are now working on a separate coronavirus response measure, designed to provide broader economic stimulus in response to ongoing financial market volatility, although the timeline for that project is uncertain. In this context the Council is urging lawmakers to address sudden defined benefit pension funding shortfalls, arising from market declines and aggressively low interest rates, through both permanent and temporary funding stabilization. 


    March 16, 2020

    Council Leading Charge for Pension Plan Funding Reform

    The U.S. House of Representatives approved a revised version of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (H.R. 6201) by a vote of 363-40 on March 14, making the U.S. Senate the next to act on legislation to provide relief from the impact of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. A Benefits Blueprint summary of the bill will be available shortly.

    A separate measure, designed to provide broader economic stimulus in response to ongoing financial market volatility, is also under development at this time.

    The Council is currently urging lawmakers to address sudden defined benefit pension funding shortfalls – arising from market declines and aggressively low interest rates – through both permanent and temporary funding stabilization. The Council’s Stable Pension Funding Coalition received an update via webinar on March 13. A recording and presentation slides for this webinar are now available.


    March 13, 2020

    House Poised to Take Up Comprehensive Coronavirus Response Legislation Including Paid Leave Provisions

    The U.S. House of Representatives appears poised to vote on a revised version of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (H.R. 6201), a bill providing relief to individuals and employees most affected by the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. An official summary of the bill, prepared by the House Appropriations Committee, is also available, although changes to the legislative language are still being made.

    The bill includes a number of provisions with implications for employer paid leave programs, discussed in more detail in the Council's March 12 Benefits Byte. Council members should stay tuned for more information if and when the House bill is approved.


    March 12, 2020

    Council Urges Uniform, Consistent Approach to Paid Leave as Part of COVID-19 Response Legislation

    In a letter sent to all members of Congress earlier today, American Benefits Council President James Klein emphasized the view of large, multistate employers that paid leave policy must enable employers to provide consistent benefits to workers regardless of where they live or work – especially as Congress is poised to address paid leave as part of emergency legislation to address the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.

    “Legislation expanding workers’ access to paid leave is one such important component of a rapid, coordinated and practical response. As Congress proceeds, in order to achieve its objective, it is imperative that any policy enacted permit employers to offer paid leave on a uniform and consistent basis nationwide,” Klein wrote.

    The full letter is available here: http://bit.ly/covid-leave


    March 11, 2020

    Treasury, IRS Issue Important Guidance Allowing Pre-Deductible Coverage of COVID-19 Testing, Treatment

    We are very pleased to report that this morning the U.S. Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued Notice 2020-15, guidance clarifying that the provision of all medical care services received, and items purchased, associated with testing for, and treatment of, COVID-19 will not disqualify a health plan from being linked with a health savings account. (A summary of the guidance will be provided in a forthcoming Benefits Byte.)

    As you know, the Council has had ongoing communication on this matter with the federal agencies the past couple weeks. Linked here is our March 10 letter formally requesting the guidance we have been urging the agencies to provide. Many thanks to all our members with whom we have discussed this issue. It was extremely helpful to us in making the case to the agencies to act quickly.

    Shortly after the IRS notice was issued, the Council issued a public statement asserting that the guidance “gives companies the assurance they needed to ensure that screening can be provided at no cost to covered beneficiaries” and expressing appreciation for the rapid response from the agencies.


    March 6, 2020

    Coronavirus Survey Results: Travel Outside United States

    The results indicate that, of 120 multinational companies whose employees travel outside of the United States for work:

    • Exactly two-thirds (67%) have instituted travel restrictions/limitations beyond those currently recommended by public health authorities (e.g., Centers for Disease Control / World Health Organization).
    • More than four-fifths (81%) have increased usage of remote work where possible for jobs in affected countries.
    • More than one-third (37%) are holding employees whole in pay in some manner where offices are closed or where jobs can’t be performed by working remotely in affected areas.

    It is important to note that numerous facts and circumstances may have changed during the period in which this survey was fielded, meaning that some of the respondents’ answers might be different if the survey was answered today. This is not intended to be a scientific or controlled survey.

    As noted in a March 5 Memo to Members, we are considering a follow-up survey with questions we have continued to receive from members in light of the fast-moving events.

    PDF: Survey Results Summary: Coronavirus Precautions for Multinational Companies (To obtain the full survey report, non-members can contact Deanna Johnson, senior director, membership.)


    March 5, 2020

    Memo from American Benefits Council President James Klein

    We understand that many of your organizations are grappling with the COVID-19 (“coronavirus”) outbreak and its impacts on your workforce, their families and the financial markets. Of course, we join with all Americans in extending our thoughts and best wishes to all who may be directly affected by the virus.

    As the situation evolves, your organization’s response to this matter is sure to have implications for compensation, health benefits and paid leave policies. Like you, the Council is continually evaluating these implications and wants to serve as a resource in any way we can. There are both immediate and longer-term issues to address.

    • At our Policy Board of Directors meeting, member companies had the opportunity to share information and strategies. We are aiming to host a membership-wide webinar soon to discuss the latest available information and corporate strategies.
    • A number of Council members are in contact with federal and global officials who have requested that employers follow – but do not exceed – prevailing advice and protocols. As circumstances require, we are prepared to reach out to congressional lawmakers and executive branch officials for guidance.
    • Apart from measures being taken to immediately protect health and safety there are practical issues regarding health plan operations, such as imposing/waiving the cost of screening tests.
    • Longer term, there needs to be consideration of better preparedness for the next pandemic, which is inevitable, and recognizing the impact of stock market volatility on 401(k) retirement savings.

    We will keep in contact with you and invite you to share questions and suggestions for the Council to consider. 

    PDF: Memo to Council Members: Employer Responses to COVID-19 ("Coronavirus") Outbreak

     

     

     

      Enacted Legislation

       

      Formal Administrative Guidance

       

       

      General Resources for Employers